<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trim-kenstein! Nambu brings Tr.im back to life, confused it is for sure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startupmeme.com/trim-kenstein-nambu-brings-trim-back-to-life-confused-it-is-for-sure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startupmeme.com/trim-kenstein-nambu-brings-trim-back-to-life-confused-it-is-for-sure/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 12:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Vingoe</title>
		<link>http://startupmeme.com/trim-kenstein-nambu-brings-trim-back-to-life-confused-it-is-for-sure/comment-page-1/#comment-19906</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Vingoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupmeme.com/trim-kenstein-nambu-brings-trim-back-to-life-confused-it-is-for-sure/#comment-19906</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree, they are building up the reputation, in an aim to sell it.  I ( I know of 2 others ) approached them about buying/taking over the service, with the express terms of honoring existing links.

For me a commercial decision that has a very close synergy with one of the URL shortening propositions that has come out of the kangareview dev team.  

From their blog of desperation, &quot;no one wants us&quot; to receiving offers ( low offers ) why wouldn&#039;t they keep it going and try to sell again later..

Not a great future for its users tho, if they don;t get a good offer, they will pull the plug again..

Am I bitter because they said no? Probably, but I also belive what ever happens, they have to figure a way that the urls are honored into the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree, they are building up the reputation, in an aim to sell it.  I ( I know of 2 others ) approached them about buying/taking over the service, with the express terms of honoring existing links.</p>
<p>For me a commercial decision that has a very close synergy with one of the URL shortening propositions that has come out of the kangareview dev team.  </p>
<p>From their blog of desperation, &#8220;no one wants us&#8221; to receiving offers ( low offers ) why wouldn&#8217;t they keep it going and try to sell again later..</p>
<p>Not a great future for its users tho, if they don;t get a good offer, they will pull the plug again..</p>
<p>Am I bitter because they said no? Probably, but I also belive what ever happens, they have to figure a way that the urls are honored into the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

