<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SproutCore- a sprout to build JavaScript Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startupmeme.com/sproutcore-a-sprout-to-build-javascript-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startupmeme.com/sproutcore-a-sprout-to-build-javascript-applications/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max M.</title>
		<link>http://startupmeme.com/sproutcore-a-sprout-to-build-javascript-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>Max M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupmeme.com/2008/06/10/sproutcore-a-sprout-to-build-javascript-applications/#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>If they are really using SproutCore then MobileMe most likely is going to suck!
You can probably say bye bye to use any of the new ‘web apps’ on your iPhone too since that JS framework is so big and a memory hog!
I remember using the gallery stuff of .Mac on Windows XP and oh man that was so terrible even on a fast network…
I remember looking at the source of that JS framework and oh man it&#039;s a lot of code to achieve that ! 
If they really wanted something light they should have used moo.fx : http://moofx.mad4milk.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they are really using SproutCore then MobileMe most likely is going to suck!<br />
You can probably say bye bye to use any of the new ‘web apps’ on your iPhone too since that JS framework is so big and a memory hog!<br />
I remember using the gallery stuff of .Mac on Windows XP and oh man that was so terrible even on a fast network…<br />
I remember looking at the source of that JS framework and oh man it&#8217;s a lot of code to achieve that !<br />
If they really wanted something light they should have used moo.fx : <a href="http://moofx.mad4milk.net/" rel="nofollow">http://moofx.mad4milk.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

