<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Releases 2007 Financial Results, Proves Its an Arm of Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://startupmeme.com/mozilla-releases-2007-financial-results-proves-its-an-arm-of-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://startupmeme.com/mozilla-releases-2007-financial-results-proves-its-an-arm-of-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:31:22 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Mielczarek</title>
		<link>http://startupmeme.com/mozilla-releases-2007-financial-results-proves-its-an-arm-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-12325</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Mielczarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://startupmeme.com/mozilla-releases-2007-financial-results-proves-its-an-arm-of-google/#comment-12325</guid>
		<description>Google is paying a commission for traffic referrals, just like they to do to Apple for Safari. Google *makes more money off of this deal than they pay to Mozilla*. They are not doing this out of the kindness of their heart. It is a business deal. That being said, they also have no control over the business operations of Mozilla. They could threaten to not renew the deal, but why would they, given that they a) make money off of it, and b) already have their own browser that they exert full control over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is paying a commission for traffic referrals, just like they to do to Apple for Safari. Google *makes more money off of this deal than they pay to Mozilla*. They are not doing this out of the kindness of their heart. It is a business deal. That being said, they also have no control over the business operations of Mozilla. They could threaten to not renew the deal, but why would they, given that they a) make money off of it, and b) already have their own browser that they exert full control over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  
