After leaving its users baffled upon the disappearance of the free version of Google Apps from its main page. The site removed that and asked users to sign up for its Premier version and be charged at $50 a year per user. However Google has stated that the removal of the Standard Version occurred due to its test with different layouts. Sounds quite stupid and I bet the obvious reason is that Google wants more users to pay for it. Anyone who has light to shed upon the matter or is Google planning to begin charging after removing all those Beta labels?
-
-
Recent Entries...
- Chatwing: Expanding the Horizons of Blogging and Internet Marketing
- West vs East Coast Business Swagger
- iPad 3 Released Has 264 PPI Retina Display, Quad Core A5X Chip, 5MP Camera–Just a retuning of The iPad 2
- The iPad 3 Will Have Haptic Feedback And Probably SenSeg Is Behind It
- iPad 3 or As Some Say the iPad HD Releasing on March 16
- Kicksend Brings Its Photo Sharing App To The iPhone
- Google AdWords Bid Management Software – WordWatch
- iPad 3 Release Is On March 7 At Apple Event
- Response: Print is Dead! Long Live Print?
- What The Fuck Am I Doing?
-
Random Entries...
- ThinkFree Launches Viewer for WordPress, Releases API and Packages ThinkFree Docs
- Have your photos on Facebook as HotBooks with Hotprints
- Ifbyphone raises $4.6 million in Series B
- Twitter Ruffles Up Feathers To Boost Ad Platform: Hires Former Facebook And Yelp Employees
- Verizon testing 4G, confirms bringing it for commercial use by 2010
-
Popular Tags
acquisition ads Android app apple Apps Ban China Chrome dead facebook funding Gmail google how to iOS iPad iphone iphone 4 iphone 5 ipod touch jailbreak microsoft mobile music myspace Nokia pakistan privacy Reports Rumors search social media social network startup startups tips tool tools Twitter verizon video web yahoo youtube



Hrm, they must be “testing different layouts” again, because the references/links to standard edition seem to have been moved completely!
I had to Google “Standard edition” to even find it!
Feels like “deceive and confuse” style marketing to me…
[Reply]